-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:51:29AM +1000, Les Bell wrote: > When building RPM's for CentOS, should I include ".el5.centos" in the > Release field? I recently built (you might remember) pdftk-1.12-1.i386.rpm > and have made it available for testing and inclusion in the Centos repos. > However, when trying to find RPM's, I find it helpful if the package > filename includes the distro and distro version number. I can easily > produce "pdftk-1.12-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm" and other related files, but is > this kosher? Or is the ".el5.centos" designation reserved for official > releases, post-QA? My suggestion would be .el5.lesbell.XXX.rpm, at it will both identify the distro and the source of the package. Best Regards, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJYE3pdyWzQ5b5ckRAseGAKC//XaUyAO5Cu5KuUETC3kI/vpIZACghdoS gtsjGvjzPI0IURiPKR+BbEw= =IUrz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----