-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 02:36:15AM -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > > > to blame will know to use "rpm -qi" to track the packager down. In any > > > case, that leaves an ambiguity; is the package for the OUP's el5, or > > CentOS > > > el5? > > > > Since it is not an official package of either of them, it really makes > > no difference, does it ? > > << > > > > Ah - I guess that answers my question: I thought that the .centos part just > > indicated that the RPM was built on/for Centos. But if it really means it's > > an official package, that's an entirely different proposition. > > Yes. As I came to understand it, those are the official packages that differ > from the one from OUP's. Just to make sure no confusion arrises here: I'm not a member of the CentOS team, so even tho I'm fairly certain my position regaring the .centos part is correct, don't take it as canon. Best Regards, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJbyhpdyWzQ5b5ckRAsdEAJ9giSFuzD4W0dgVN8RuQ2stcumF2QCeIDDB NgO9rfhiGAyWtdHwrmL0T7w= =f/9E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----