On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 14:48 +0200, Gernot Stocker wrote: > On Friday 27 April 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 22:31 -0700, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: > > > Could you give the machine a good solid couple hours of memtest? > > This weekend I will try to run the memtest over night but I don't expect any > results from this test. We were already running a scientific application in > testmode, which in general reports almost immediately if a RAM is not > working properly. It is stresstesting CPU and RAM and is crosschecking > the numerical outcome with precalculated results. It stops immediately as > soon as the result differ from the expected ones. OK ... I can confirm that I copied a large file (650mb ISO file) from ext3 to XFS partition ... and the MD5 sums were indeed different (This is on an i686 kernel, with the standard module loaded) However, I did not have any errors in: "xfs_logprint /dev/hda3" so this is quite strange. > > > I have set up an i686 test box to grab the XFS test suite out of SGI's > > CVS. > > > > I will run this test suite for i686 (and also for x64_64) and work with > > SGI to address failures. > > That' sounds lika a good plan! Let me know when you have a fix for the > module or if I can help you with a module which gives you more debug > information. Just let me know what to do. I have the test suite compiled now and I will kick off this test in a little while. > > > I will also test the specific issue brought up below as well. > > > > Should have some progress on this issue today. > > Cool! > -- Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20070427/cea48df7/attachment-0007.sig>