On 8/3/07, Daniel de Kok <danieldk at pobox.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 07:57 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: > > On 8/3/07, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > Being that we (ATRPMS/CentOS) are working together on some projects > > > already and if you are interested in doing this MythCentOS project under > > > the CentOS umbrella, then we can discuss this among the Core CentOS > > > group ... but I think we would agree to allow a MythCentOS to exist and > > > use the CentOS name. > > > > Gets my vote. > > If Axel is interested, I agree that it would be nice to look if that can > be worked out. > Well I think Axel's question though does cover some other issues though. What are the CentOS trademark guidelines? Currently there do not seem to be any listed on the website. There do not seem to be any in the included product, and there does not seem to be a registered trademark. I know this gets into the murky area of law, ip etc.. but it does come up and people's assumptions that they can use it for anything they want because it is not OBVIOUSLY registered, protected, or guidelined.. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"