I agree. Although it is not my decision, I think the "polite" thing to do > would be to leave the CentOS trademarks out, but give adequate and glowing > credit to the CentOS developers that made the OS possible. Just like the > CentOS developers do to upstream whenever they can. I think that depends on the project, for mythtv I expect this would mostly be a matter of building many packages for a (mostly) unmodified base centos system. As such you could probably have most of these in a base 'centimyth' repo, and pull the rest directly from the centos repos. I think some sort of logo being a merger of the centos logo and mythtv logos would be most appropriate here. Of course this would require approval from the dev team. In Axel's or Dag's case I expect such approval would be for the most part a formality (but would still need to be given!)... For other projects... who knows ;-) [can you see the trust I have for atrpms, dag and rpmforge? Thanks for the awesome work guys] Now going back to getting CentOS5 working on a santa rosa macbook pro (out of the box even the network card doesn't work). Cheers, Maciej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20070803/36b23965/attachment-0007.html>