-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 04:37:21PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 14:12 -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:54:05PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > Joshua Kramer wrote: > > > > > > > >All, > > > > > > > >Does anyone have a timeline for the CentOS 5 release candidates and/or > > > >final? > > > > > > We will aim to have the CentOS-5 Final release within 2 weeks of > > > upstream release. So far, based on news around ETA upstream looks like > > > 15th March. > > > > Karan, > > I'm asking, obviously, for a guess here. > > > > How viable do you think it will be to do an upgrade from > > 4.4 to 5 on a live system, based on what you've seen on the beta ? > > considering where they came from and the kernel versions installed it > should be about the same as updating from Fedora Core 3's original > release to Fedora Core 6's original release. FC6 ? Are you sure ? I figured RHEL 5 would be based on FC4, maybe FC5. []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF2PErpdyWzQ5b5ckRAt+SAKCfe0s0j12t6proPOSkchuKByr4IACfR3kc JSy4jlXog4AhoOsolDrG9gw= =2NPD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----