bugs.centos.org (was RE: [CentOS-devel] Re: kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test is available for i686 and x86_64 in the Testing Repo)
John Summerfield
debian at herakles.homelinux.orgSun Jan 7 12:35:35 UTC 2007
- Previous message: bugs.centos.org (was RE: [CentOS-devel] Re: kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test is available for i686 and x86_64 in the Testing Repo)
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Re: bugs.centos.org (was RE: Re: kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test is available for i686 and x86_64 in the Testing Repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karanbir Singh wrote: > John Summerfield wrote: >> It seems to me that the word "issue" is frequently used when someone >> doesn't wish to acknowledge a bug, outage or other problem or >> deficiency exists with their product or service. > > The reason why we prefer to think of it as being an issue tracker rather > than a bug tracker is because we use the bugs.centos.org setup for > things other than bugs as well. > > eg. We often ask for good and bad feedback on packages in the testing > repositories on the "issue tracker". We might also register an issue at > bugs.centos.org and actually report it elsewhere where the bug really > exists and use the bugs.centos.org ticket as just that - an issue > tracker. There have also often been many situations where we've tracked > specific driver issues ( some bugs, mostly just user issues ) there as > well. > > I suppose most organisations have a support system, a bug tracker, a > contact and knowledge base setup. We just have the mailing lists and the > issue tracker :) I'll try to remember that in CentOS, "issue" usually means "bug" or "problem:-)" I found myself wondering what on earth Johnny was talking about a few moments ago. I have learned a fairly liberal interpretation of "bug," which can reasonably include documentation problems (including absence and lack of clarity) and suggestions for improvement. And design and even specification errors: it seems to me the fact that mkisofs can modify its source tree is a bug even though this behaviour is documented. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Please do not reply off-list
- Previous message: bugs.centos.org (was RE: [CentOS-devel] Re: kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test is available for i686 and x86_64 in the Testing Repo)
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Re: bugs.centos.org (was RE: Re: kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test is available for i686 and x86_64 in the Testing Repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list