[CentOS-devel] RE: bugs.centos.org
Ralph Angenendt
ra+centos at br-online.deTue Jan 9 09:51:17 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RE: bugs.centos.org
- Next message: bugs.centos.org (was RE: [CentOS-devel] Re: kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test is available for i686 and x86_64 in the Testing Repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Swallow wrote: > If you want to trust me, I'm volunteering as well :-) I'd suggest > another mailing list, maybe bugteam at lists.centos.org - and have that > address get assigned any new bugs (and all unassigned old ones) so > interested people (ie, the "Trusted Users") can get a copy of all the > bug reports. But then you would need a request tracker to track which people are working on what bugs }:> Seems to me that that one is a layer too much. But yes, a mailing list for that could be discussed, centos-devel probably would be cluttered by those mails. > It seems bugs get automatically assigned to you at the > moment? Yes, depending on which component the bug is filed against. But it is no problem to "take over" a bug - once you have an access level which allows you to, that is. >> We (the developers) will also (from time to time) create "issue >> trackers" in the bugs database to report positive and negative >> feedback >> for packages that we put into the testing repo. > > That's good - I think you could say that is similar to a "Package > Review" bug report in the RedHat bugzilla for a new Fedora Extras > package. Not everything has to be a "bug". Yes. See (for example) #1603 and #1580. > How about adding a Category called "Upstream-RHEL4", and changing bugs > from whatever the category is currently to "Upstream-RHEL4" once it > has been reported upstream? Easier to keep track of upstream bugs > that way I think, and you can run a report on how many bugs were > reported by CentOS users. Sounds good to me. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20070109/81c9b36e/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] RE: bugs.centos.org
- Next message: bugs.centos.org (was RE: [CentOS-devel] Re: kernel-2.6.9-42.37.EL.c4test is available for i686 and x86_64 in the Testing Repo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list