-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:06:38PM +0100, Daniel de Kok wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >I'm mostly fine with what is on there, but please see the discussion > >points at the bottom of that page. > > - Wrt. HTML e-mail, "strongly discouraged" sounds good to me. Gotta hate HTML e-mails. > - Wrt. language vs regional: can someone comment how much e.g. pt_BR > differs from pt_PT? A lot. > Is it like US English and UK English, or do they > differ to such an extend that it would be difficult to communicate on > one list? As a rule of thumb, a pt_BR speaker would have as much (or sometimes more) trouble communicating with someone who speaks pt_PT as with someone that speaks spanish. Sometime even more, since there are words that are common, but with completely different meanings. > I think it is a relevant "data point" for this discussion. True. []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFtM7WpdyWzQ5b5ckRAnVLAKCQBR+juPEcvxjwoVCO10zH1ToOmQCeNfZD nXp2LntrUJw/6vDSuOGo/30= =v/KB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----