[CentOS-devel] Re: Re: Octave for CentOS5

seth vidal

skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Thu Mar 8 17:22:32 UTC 2007


On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:43 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 11:07 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:04 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 09:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > Phil Schaffner wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Yes - had looked at all those.  I was referring to the EPEL-specific
> > > > > Wiki pages and epel-devel list, and specifically how to contribute to
> > > > > EPEL and suggest/request/help-with packages without being an Extras
> > > > > developer. 
> > > > 
> > > > Ah, overlooked the "how to contribute... without being an Extras'
> > > > developer".  Short of actually maintaining packages (ie, signing cla and
> > > > becoming an Extras contributor), you're limited mostly to participating on
> > > > the epel lists, providing opinions, feedback (via ml or bugzilla).
> > > > 
> > > > -- Rex 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Not that I am complaining ... but don't you think if all the CentOS
> > > Developers sign a cla and become Fedora Extras Developers that starts
> > > many questions?
> > > 
> > > I certainly don't think that the CORE CentOS developers can do that ...
> > > maybe I am wrong.  I guess it depends on the cla.
> > 
> > what questions does it start? 
> > 
> > -sv
> > 
> 
> Hey ... is CentOS a Red Hat project, you guys are also Fedora Devels?
> 
> (That is one major question, for example)

let me ask a silly question: How does it matter? Let's say centos was a
red hat project. That red hat inc had decided they wanted a rebuild of
rhel for people who could not/would not pay for rhel and they wanted to
have it done by people outside of red hat. How would it change the facts
of the matter that centos 1. exists 2. does a bang-up job making things
work well, reliably and innovating in great ways outside of the core
distro?

How would those things changed if Centos was blessed by Red Hat or if it
was not?

I don't think it would. No more than gcc changes b/c red hat pays some
people to work on it and does not pay other folks. Nor the kernel.
Centos is a community project that operates in a space left open and
unfilled by any company. It's been doing a great job at providing for
people who would otherwise be left out in the cold and anyone who says
otherwise is completely full of crap.

so who cares if someone thinks it is a red hat blessed project or not?
People think all sorts of stupid things.

If, at the end of the day, it does a good job, is free and helps people
why does it matter?

-sv







More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list