[CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC patch for DRBD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org 
> [mailto:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Ross S. 
> W. Walker
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:32 AM
> To: The CentOS developers mailing list.
> Subject: RE: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC 
> patch for DRBD
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:08 AM
> > To: CentOS-Devel
> > Subject: RE: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC
> > patch for DRBD
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 02:08 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 21:10 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org
> > > > > [mailto:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Ross S.
> > > > > W. Walker
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:24 PM
> > > > > To: centos-devel at centos.org
> > > > > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC
> > > > > patch for DRBD
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Attention CentOS Developers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is a back-port of Lars Ellenberg's md raid1/10
> > patch from 2.6.19+
> > > > > to 2.6.9. It seems the md raid1 and raid10 drivers were
> > stripping the
> > > > > BIO_RW_SYNC flags on requests which caused a severe
> > > > > performance penalty
> > > > > for DRBD when writing it's meta-data to these volumes.
> > > > >
> > > > > The patch is attached as well as inlined:
> > > >
> > > > No comments?
> > >
> > > I just put it in the new CentOSPlus kernel (that I am currently
> > > testing).
> > >
> > > Should be out later today (if it works).
> >
> >
> > OK ... the released CentOS-Plus kernel
> > (2.6.9-42.0.10.plus.c4) has that
> > patch installed on x86_64 and i386 ... and I did install it and test
> > with DRBD.  The systems it is on are running OK.
> 
> Excellect, I am currently running the patch on my x86_64 plus 
> kernel here 
> with no problems, and I have the OS booting off of RAID1, I have the 
> meta-data as a LVM on the OS vg and no problems and a significant 
> improvement with my large DRBD volumes.
> 
> Lars did review the fixes too and gave them the ok, so it wasn't 
> completely without review.
> 

Ok, I just updated to that kernel, kernel-2.6.9-42.0.10.plus.c4, and I do not see the patch in there?

Did it miss the final cut?

-Ross

______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.