[CentOS-devel] Re: Re: Octave for CentOS5
Johnny Hughes
mailing-lists at hughesjr.comThu Mar 8 16:04:42 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Re: Re: Octave for CentOS5
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Re: Re: Octave for CentOS5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 09:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Phil Schaffner wrote: > > > Yes - had looked at all those. I was referring to the EPEL-specific > > Wiki pages and epel-devel list, and specifically how to contribute to > > EPEL and suggest/request/help-with packages without being an Extras > > developer. > > Ah, overlooked the "how to contribute... without being an Extras' > developer". Short of actually maintaining packages (ie, signing cla and > becoming an Extras contributor), you're limited mostly to participating on > the epel lists, providing opinions, feedback (via ml or bugzilla). > > -- Rex > Not that I am complaining ... but don't you think if all the CentOS Developers sign a cla and become Fedora Extras Developers that starts many questions? I certainly don't think that the CORE CentOS developers can do that ... maybe I am wrong. I guess it depends on the cla. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20070308/2b471f07/attachment-0002.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Re: Re: Octave for CentOS5
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Re: Re: Octave for CentOS5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list