[CentOS-devel] Zero day updates upstream

Roger Peña

orkcu at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 16 17:51:04 UTC 2007


--- Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:

> C. Halstead wrote:
> > ----- "Karanbir Singh" <mail-lists at karan.org>
> wrote:
> >> Just talking to Lance and Johnny online, and we
> feel the best way 
> >> forward might be to add an Media-Updates/ repo on
> the iso's itself - 
> >> then list both the local media updates as well as
> mirror.centos.org 
> >> updates repo's in the anaconda screen, both
> disabled.
> >>
> >> We feel this gives us the max wins in each
> direction ( but will
> >> slightly increase the data size on the last cd,
> as packages from cd-1
> >> will move to cd-2 etc.
> >>
> >> I will still try and ensure that a minimum
> install is possible using 
> >> only cd-1, but cant promise that.
> >>
> >> - KB
> > 
> > +1 to this if we can still produce a single-CD
> minimal install.  IMO the value if a one-disc
> install is higher than the value of a release that
> contains the initial update set.  In a month or two
> there will be additional updates to apply anyway, so
> it doesn't seem prudent to sacrifice the one-disc
> install for the life of the release to gain a (very)
> small convenience up front.  Just my .02
> > 
> > ---
> 
> if we can get a few more people voting this way,
> then I feel we have a 
> decision on this issue.

I also vote for follow RH

the new kernel I think will not give any plus hardware
support only security fix, so why not to install it
inmidiatly after os instalation ...

cu
roger

__________________________________________
RedHat Certified Engineer ( RHCE )
Cisco Certified Network Associate ( CCNA )


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peek at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list