Matt Hyclak wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:07:20AM +0000, Karanbir Singh enlightened us: >> Ralph Angenendt wrote: >>> Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>> So, what does everyone thing ? Should we release the tree with the >>>> updates rolled in ? or should we release the tree exactly as upstream >>>> did, and also provide the updates to go alongside - but in the updates >>>> repo ? >>> Yes. Stick to upstream release disks and roll out the updates at the >>> same time. >>> >> should we also add a line to the default installer that has the updates >> repo already listed ( but unselected ) at install time ? giving the user >> a chance to enable and use packages from there? ( only if they are >> really online ) > > I think the update repo being there and unchecked by default is a great way > to handle this. > Just talking to Lance and Johnny online, and we feel the best way forward might be to add an Media-Updates/ repo on the iso's itself - then list both the local media updates as well as mirror.centos.org updates repo's in the anaconda screen, both disabled. We feel this gives us the max wins in each direction ( but will slightly increase the data size on the last cd, as packages from cd-1 will move to cd-2 etc. I will still try and ensure that a minimum install is possible using only cd-1, but cant promise that. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq