> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org > [mailto:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Ross S. > W. Walker > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 9:22 AM > To: The CentOS developers mailing list. > Subject: RE: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC > patch for DRBD > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-devel-bounces at centos.org > > [mailto:centos-devel-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > > Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 6:15 AM > > To: CentOS-Devel > > Subject: RE: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC > > patch for DRBD > > <snip> > > Does that make a difference, will yum recognize it as a > upgrade or dependency from the current version? > > Also I didn't install the standard kernel I did a yum update > from 2.6.9-42.0.8.plus.c4smp and it went ahead and installed > the standard? > > Maybe the mirror hadn't received all the updates yet and it > decided the standard was the best candidate? It was the mirror having not sync'd up all the updates. I did notice something, that might have been true before, but just noticed now. The kernel development headers are marked as upgrades to the previous ones so you can only have one installed at a time. That makes it hard to compile kernel drivers for previous versions you may have installed if you need to revert back to the previous version. -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.