On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 11:07 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:04 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 09:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > Phil Schaffner wrote: > > > > > > > Yes - had looked at all those. I was referring to the EPEL-specific > > > > Wiki pages and epel-devel list, and specifically how to contribute to > > > > EPEL and suggest/request/help-with packages without being an Extras > > > > developer. > > > > > > Ah, overlooked the "how to contribute... without being an Extras' > > > developer". Short of actually maintaining packages (ie, signing cla and > > > becoming an Extras contributor), you're limited mostly to participating on > > > the epel lists, providing opinions, feedback (via ml or bugzilla). > > > > > > -- Rex > > > > > > > Not that I am complaining ... but don't you think if all the CentOS > > Developers sign a cla and become Fedora Extras Developers that starts > > many questions? > > > > I certainly don't think that the CORE CentOS developers can do that ... > > maybe I am wrong. I guess it depends on the cla. > > what questions does it start? > > -sv > Hey ... is CentOS a Red Hat project, you guys are also Fedora Devels? (That is one major question, for example) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20070308/22de66ee/attachment-0007.sig>