James Olin Oden wrote: >> Yep. Didn't someone famous once say that threads is for those who can't >> work out how to use select()? > Funny you should say that. The original design of this daemon was to > use select with mulitple processes connected with pipes. I actually > know how to do that but at some point as an alternative I started > looking at perl threads, and it looked like it would simplify things. > I think in the end it did somewhat, but instead of pipes you have > fifos to communicate between the master thread and the listener > threads...sounds pretty isomorphic to me. Furthermore, I still have > to serialize objects going into the fifo because perl does not support > just sending an object through the fifo...guess what...I would have > had to do that with pipes and select(). > Wouldn't separate processes using a shared memory segment have been easier all around? I think you still have to serialize in and out because of perl's strange way of storing variables, though. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com