single disc minimal install following the upstream's release +1 Karanbir Singh wrote: > C. Halstead wrote: >> ----- "Karanbir Singh" <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >>> Just talking to Lance and Johnny online, and we feel the best way >>> forward might be to add an Media-Updates/ repo on the iso's itself - >>> then list both the local media updates as well as mirror.centos.org >>> updates repo's in the anaconda screen, both disabled. >>> >>> We feel this gives us the max wins in each direction ( but will >>> slightly increase the data size on the last cd, as packages from cd-1 >>> will move to cd-2 etc. >>> >>> I will still try and ensure that a minimum install is possible using >>> only cd-1, but cant promise that. >>> >>> - KB >> >> +1 to this if we can still produce a single-CD minimal install. IMO >> the value if a one-disc install is higher than the value of a release >> that contains the initial update set. In a month or two there will be >> additional updates to apply anyway, so it doesn't seem prudent to >> sacrifice the one-disc install for the life of the release to gain a >> (very) small convenience up front. Just my .02 >> >> --- > > if we can get a few more people voting this way, then I feel we have a > decision on this issue. > > - KB > -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape" CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician) Linux user #322099 Machines: 206822 256638 276825 http://counter.li.org/