On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:38:04PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:09:52PM -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote: > > >> I know that Dag and Karanbir both participate in the list (I'm > >> making no claims for their satisfaction with how things are going > >> so far). Axel Thimm, who's a Fedora developer who also runs a > >> third-party repo, is also very active with EPEL. > > > But also very disappointed from the course that EPEL chose to take wrt > > to all other 3rd party repos. He's currently stripping off repotags > > from his repo cursing all day people in EPEL that forced him to do > > this. > > Maybe if we all can agree to some ground rules, then all repos can play > nice. See proposal: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/RepositoryCollaboration These rules should had been going w/o saying, but sadly the true colors look more like (on discussing repotags): 00:55 < mmcgrath> | I'm just tired of playing politics with people who are trying to define what rules we play by even though they don't honor our rules. 00:55 < mmcgrath> | I mean hell, how many of those 3rd party repos have even signed a cla? 00:55 < mmcgrath> | We're aiming much larger then they are and we have a much different structure as a result. I'm tired of trying to build bridges. It wore me off in fedora.us days and it's happening again with epel. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20070505/6718d940/attachment-0005.sig>