[CentOS-devel] RHSA-2007:1020

[Maciej Żenczykowski]

I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos built
against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1 against
the 5.1 tree.

On 11/1/07, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:55:12PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > For the time being, we released with el5_0, but I would really vote for
> > rebuild with 5.1 ( so we get the linking and stuff right, and can
> > actually rpmverify for an exact match ) and release that rebuilt package
> > when we can.
>
> +1
>
> --
> Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071101/aa968f43/attachment.html>