[CentOS-devel] About compile option for i386 of cachefilesd
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.org
Wed Nov 7 11:38:17 UTC 2007
DAICON wrote:
> CC:centos-devel at centos.org
>
> Hi.
> Mr. David Howells.
>
> About compile option for i386 of cachefilesd.
>
> Confirmed environment:
> 1, On i386 platform
> OS : CentOS 5 i386
> CPU : Pentium M
> Mem : 2G
> Kernel : 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 22 08:32:04 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> (Installed by RPM)
> cachefilesd : cachefilesd-0.7-6
> (Installed by RPM)
>
> I test cachefilesd (RPM package) on i386 machine, and I found issue.
> cachefilesd stopped when the file that exceeded 2Gbytes was loaded from NFS Server.
> This is because compile option "-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"
> is not set when compiling.
>
> When this option is set, it seems to operate normally.
>
> You should set this option by default when thinking about the function of cachefilesd.
> I think.
>
> Is there problem in this compile option setting?
>
I have pulled the upstream binary and compared it to the CentOS binary
... here is the result
Verifying cachefilesd-0.7-6.el5.i386.rpm ...
cachefilesd-0.7-6.el5.i386.rpm OK-PERFECT ref:44133 +/-:0 %:0
That means it is linked to all the same things AND, the OK-PERFECT means
that even the Size reported for the RPM is identical.
If there is a problem with the compile options, it seems that it is
identical in CentOS and the upstream provider's product.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071107/6f34d26a/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list