[CentOS-devel] RHSA-2007:1020

Feels to me like even if the package has no changes it's 'different' than
upstream and should have the label + appropriate coment somewhere in the
README.

On 11/2/07, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
>
> Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> > I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos
> > built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1
> > against the 5.1 tree.
>
> We thought about this at the time, however that would cause more
> confusion we felt. the '.centos' bit is added only when there is a
> change in the sources from upstream. I suppose we can revisit the policy
> should this kind of a thing become more common in the future.
>
> --
> Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522219 at icq
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071102/5b0e5488/attachment-0001.html>