[CentOS-devel] RHSA-2007:1020

Thu Nov 1 01:21:18 UTC 2007
Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>


Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> 3) We build it now against 5.0 and Tag it accordingly, and then rebuild it 
>> when 5.1 is out and then change Tag to 5_1. It will be a different RPM and 
>> would involve most uses doing two updates.
> As ugly as it is - this should be what to do. Yes, it sucks. Hard. But
> security updates aren't updates to wait upon.

Yes, thats what I thought as well. The only major issue is that we have 
extra rpms for cups-*-el5_0*.rpm knocking about for i386/x86_64 that 
wont exist upstream at all.

Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522219 at icq