[CentOS-devel] RHSA-2007:1020

Fri Nov 2 14:01:24 UTC 2007
Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>

Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos 
> built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1 
> against the 5.1 tree.

We thought about this at the time, however that would cause more 
confusion we felt. the '.centos' bit is added only when there is a 
change in the sources from upstream. I suppose we can revisit the policy 
should this kind of a thing become more common in the future.

Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522219 at icq