Hi, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> 3) We build it now against 5.0 and Tag it accordingly, and then rebuild it >> when 5.1 is out and then change Tag to 5_1. It will be a different RPM and >> would involve most uses doing two updates. > As ugly as it is - this should be what to do. Yes, it sucks. Hard. But > security updates aren't updates to wait upon. Yes, thats what I thought as well. The only major issue is that we have extra rpms for cups-*-el5_0*.rpm knocking about for i386/x86_64 that wont exist upstream at all. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq