I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1 against the 5.1 tree. On 11/1/07, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:55:12PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > For the time being, we released with el5_0, but I would really vote for > > rebuild with 5.1 ( so we get the linking and stuff right, and can > > actually rpmverify for an exact match ) and release that rebuilt package > > when we can. > > +1 > > -- > Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071101/aa968f43/attachment-0007.html>