I meant the extra centos tag added to the 5.0 built versio of the package. I do understand the problem posed by the 5.1 version of the package being out before 5.1 ;-) On 11/1/07, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: > > I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos > > built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1 > > against the 5.1 tree. > > That is what upstream is doing ... the problem is, they are releasing > el5_1 stuff, built against the el5_1 tree _BUT_ as of now, there _IS_NO_ > el5_1 tree. > > That is what leaves CentOS without the ability to build these things as > they are currently being built upstream. > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071102/5a1928d8/attachment-0007.html>