Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: > I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos > built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1 > against the 5.1 tree. We thought about this at the time, however that would cause more confusion we felt. the '.centos' bit is added only when there is a change in the sources from upstream. I suppose we can revisit the policy should this kind of a thing become more common in the future. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq