Jan Iven wrote: > On 07/11/07 12:38, Johnny Hughes wrote: > .. >> I have pulled the upstream binary and compared it to the CentOS binary >> ... here is the result >> >> Verifying cachefilesd-0.7-6.el5.i386.rpm ... >> cachefilesd-0.7-6.el5.i386.rpm OK-PERFECT ref:44133 +/-:0 %:0 >> >> That means it is linked to all the same things AND, the OK-PERFECT means >> that even the Size reported for the RPM is identical. > > Interesting tool - could you tell me more about this? > TIA > Jan Sure ... it is here: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/build/distro/tmverifyrpms You can use it to compare RPMS of the same name in a CentOS and RHEL directory that reside in the same directory as the script. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071107/83add4e6/attachment-0007.sig>