[CentOS-devel] RHSA-2007:1020

Ralph Angenendt ra+centos at br-online.de
Wed Oct 31 23:37:53 UTC 2007

Karanbir Singh wrote:
> 3) We build it now against 5.0 and Tag it accordingly, and then rebuild it 
> when 5.1 is out and then change Tag to 5_1. It will be a different RPM and 
> would involve most uses doing two updates.
> Opinions ?

As ugly as it is - this should be what to do. Yes, it sucks. Hard. But
security updates aren't updates to wait upon.

Sucks. Sucks. Sucks. But let us do it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071101/857088c1/attachment.sig>

More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list