Karanbir Singh wrote: > 3) We build it now against 5.0 and Tag it accordingly, and then rebuild it > when 5.1 is out and then change Tag to 5_1. It will be a different RPM and > would involve most uses doing two updates. > > Opinions ? As ugly as it is - this should be what to do. Yes, it sucks. Hard. But security updates aren't updates to wait upon. Sucks. Sucks. Sucks. But let us do it. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20071101/857088c1/attachment-0007.sig>