[CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
Ralph Angenendt
ra+centos at br-online.deThu Apr 10 09:58:29 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: > There is something that I don't have clearly understood, why couldn't you > use icedtea java instead ? Because icedtea is Java 1.7, which isn't really there yet. This one is Java 1.6. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080410/b07d3d62/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list