[CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgThu Apr 10 12:58:59 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: >> There is something that I don't have clearly understood, why couldn't you >> use icedtea java instead ? > > Because icedtea is Java 1.7, which isn't really there yet. This one is > Java 1.6. And even Java 1.6 is a strech, as the webstack is currently built using java-1.4.2 ... which we can not use to build since we can not distribute it. Java 1.6 is the one we will need to use to get as close as possible to the correct version AND be able to release the RPMS themselves and the JRE required to run them. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080410/0622e0c6/attachment-0002.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list