-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Manuel Tuthill wrote: |> I doubt that hijacking a thread will endear you to the developers! | Reading the note on thread hijacking I do not think I'm guilty but while I'm | happy to have a drawn out discussion on netiquette I'm fairly sure that here | isn't the right place. If anyone would like to continue the discussion I'd | be happy to respond off list, or you can grab me on IRC #centos(Lawbringer). | | Is it possible to now return to discussing the possibility of i586 support | under C5? Guilty as charged based on the evidence found in the headers of your own message: From: "Manuel Tuthill" <Manuel at Nebula-IT.co.uk> To: "'The CentOS developers mailing list.'" <centos-devel at centos.org> References: <47F51DEC.9070204 at ociweb.com> <47F53D35.7050502 at centos.org> <47F53DDF.4080104 at ociweb.com> <47F54952.7030506 at karan.org> <47F548E8.8040407 at ociweb.com><47F54D97.5090901 at karan.org> <47F54DFD.6000605 at ociweb.com> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:26:21 +0100 Message-ID: <009b01c89646$be2a4ee0$0201a8c0 at luke> So we should return to the subject of "CentOS and JBoss" as by your request. If you want to start a new thread then do so. But do it with a fresh message and not a reply. This branch is pretty much dead. Hugo. - -- hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH90vfBvzDRVjxmYERArAIAKCE85xV58U8YAyk0PnluV/zb1NlfACgrTd7 d41PSolfiwFUijQBTKBcYss= =W7MQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----