Johnny Hughes wrote: > John Summerfield wrote: >> Is it useful to add this to the C bugz? >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441615 >> >> I think that an alternative to the workaround mentioned there is to >> build the kernel with different options, but I've not tried that. >> >> >> >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248186 > > That does not mention the specific model, but I think the problems are > the same .. if so, it is in the 5.1 release notes from upstream already. Mine's Intel CPU & chipset. I don't think they're the same. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-)