[CentOS-devel] Rawhide
Jeff Johnson
n3npq at mac.comTue Aug 5 23:09:39 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Rawhide
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Rawhide
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 5, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > >> Les Mikesell wrote: >>> It doesn't matter who does it or where - making something that is >>> not >>> inherently backwards compatible is bound to cause pain. >> >> As does making something which has to be backwards compatible all the >> time. > > Exactly, both comments conjured a smile on my face :) > While I'm happy to see a smile on yer face, and backward compatibility is incredibly important (you are one of the few who understands that importance), *BUT* I'm forced to point out that the engineering changes that led to the creation of perl-devel packaging are quite sound. The perl package always was a messy mixture of modules and other "stuff", pretending otherwise is foolish. One needs to balance fixes against compatibility on a case by case basis. No one rule, or one policy, can be generally applied. 73 de Jeff -- who really doesn't wish to be an apologetic advocate of Fedora "suicide"
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Rawhide
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Rawhide
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list