Ned Slider a écrit : > Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> Ned Slider wrote: >> >>> I agree with Dag that solution providers shouldn't be able to sell it as >>> CentOS if it clearly isn't because they've modified, disabled or removed >>> key parts of the system. >>> >> ok, so lets be clear about one thing - no-one except CentOS.org can >> distribute anything called 'CentOS'. Everything else is just 'derived >> from, based on, using parts of, inspired from etc. >> >> > > Agreed - I think the gripes I see mainly stem from hosting providers > selling solutions that are based on CentOS as CentOS... the /based on/ > seems to get forgotten somewhere along the line. Their not distributing > it, just selling a solution using it or based on it. Things should be more simple if providers could targeted theirs products as a single name branded repo, the same way that centosplus repo deals with other centos upstream repos.