On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Its not immediately clear as to who this is targeting. Is it for people > who base their products off CentOS ? or is it for the Users who end up > with broken setups ? The reason for my confusion is that the doc seems > to target the product builders, but the support issue is something that > comes down to the users. > > Also, as far as I am concerned, if their product has >= 1 rpm taken from > CentOS, then thats what it is, based on CentOS, based around CentOS, > incorporating CentOS, whatever one might term it as. If its got bits > from CentOS, they should be able to tell people its got bits from CentOS. coming to it 'cold', I assumed it was targetted at those basing 'product' on CentOS. Sort of a short version of how to live well with the community. I suggest a piece on or link to good rpm naming/disttag usage, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE jim at rossberry.com http://www.rossberry.com "Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one." Thomas Paine