On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:13:13PM +0100, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: > The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard recommends /srv/www but only one of the > big, SuSE, uses it. Actually it doesn't. For big sites hosting various services it recommends a /srv/<domain>/<service> layout as well. It also makes rights management easier (give admins of domainX full access to /srv/domainX, admins of domainY full access to /srv/domainY and so on). In fact it is deliberately left to the site admin how to deal with it, which is why no vendor or distribution should touch anything inside /srv other than offering the /srv folder itself. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080226/72541c27/attachment-0005.sig>