Johnny Hughes a écrit : > Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: >> Dear Sirs, >> >> Another disappointing question for me is the desigend Web Apps >> directory. >> >> The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard recommends /srv/www but only one of >> the big, SuSE, uses it. >> Debian uses /var/www. >> Mandriva uses both /var/www and /usr/share. >> Red Hat used /var/www and now /usr/share. >> CentOS uses /usr/share and RPMForge uses /var/www. >> >> So my question is, what will be the future Web Apps directory for >> rpmRepo ? >> >> Be sure, I don't want to annoy anyone, I really want the best for >> CentOS that we use every day in our production environment. >> >> And this Filesystem Web Directory question is poisonning me for a >> while, when I want to mix up packages, but also to make the good >> choice for my own ones. >> >> Best Regards, >> Jean-Marc Liger - Sorbonne University Networks > > Well ... we use what is in RHEL. Our whole goal is everything the > same, which means the same place. > > When I create packages, I try to follow what RHEL does as an example. > So we use also use /var/www/ or /usr/share as well in our extras or > centosplus. Well ... the first move I found from /var/www to /usr/share was in a CentOS package :) * Sat Oct 29 2005 Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> 3.0.6-1.centos4 - Initial build for CentOS4 - Changed the html location to be consistent w/CentOS web apps (/usr/share) Fedora also follows this way : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines I'm not so happy with that because it gets rid of precision. First we can find several type files in /usr/share and secondly the web directory can change from /usr/share/%{name}/web-files to more complicated /usr/share/%{name}/[htdocs/html/wwwroot/www/...]/web-files, depending of the source bundle. But life is not every time a happyness, so I'm looking for a unique choice to follow if possible (for CentOS packaging only).