On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:34:25AM +0100, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: > Axel Thimm a écrit : >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:13:13PM +0100, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: >> >>> The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard recommends /srv/www but only one of the >>> big, SuSE, uses it. >>> >> >> Actually it doesn't. For big sites hosting various services it >> recommends a /srv/<domain>/<service> layout as well. It also makes >> rights management easier (give admins of domainX full access to >> /srv/domainX, admins of domainY full access to /srv/domainY and so >> on). >> >> In fact it is deliberately left to the site admin how to deal with it, >> which is why no vendor or distribution should touch anything inside >> /srv other than offering the /srv folder itself. > > SuSE uses /srv/www for its packaging Web Apps : > http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service/Build_Service_Installation_Tutorial/CentOS > > But I agree hosting domainX Web Apps should be in /srv/domainX. I don't disagree with suse doing that, but with the FHS recommending /srv/www. My wording was a bit unclear, sorry. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080226/849bb0a6/attachment-0007.sig>