Hello Tim, this information is pure gold for me :) thanxs a lot. greets Michael On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:35 +0100, Tim Verhoeven wrote: > On Jan 17, 2008 3:29 PM, Theurl Michael <michael.theurl at smog.at> wrote: > > > > I do not know if someone out there had/have this problems. > > > > We have two HP-bl20p-G4 2xQuadCore Xeon E5320 Intel cpu's Blade. > > with following software on it > > > > * centos 5.1 x86_64 > > * xen hypervisior 3.1 from centos distri. > > > > > > And run on it following guests: > > 32bit centos4.6 domU's with xen_domU_kernel from update repo. > > > > Some of this machines are running fine and some of this are dying > > sometimes under load or no load. > > It look's for me strange. > > > > So my question is there a basic problem to run domU32 bit systems on a > > 64bit hardware ? > > If i read the newest messages on xen this is now a big goal for xen 3.1 > > but i know it can be a bug or a misunderstood config on my side. > > > > Hopefully someone out there can help me with this problem. > > ...snip... > > Hi Michael, > > Support for running 32 bit Paravirt Xen VM's on a 64bit host was added > to 5.1 as a technology preview by the upstream provider. This means > that this has not been fully tested and is not supported. > > I've also have been testing this and I had the same issues. Most of > the times I could not even get a install to finish. > > So I guess the best thing to do is to create tickets for this in the > upstreams bugzilla and hope they have fixed the issues for 5.2 > > Regards, > Tim > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080117/5cc7d6a2/attachment-0007.sig>