[CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?
Ralph Angenendt
ra+centos at br-online.deThu Jul 3 15:36:11 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Axel Thimm wrote: > | I start to think whether these kernels are indeed being all used to > | the extend of justifying full kmdl support. Maybe it would make sense > | to keep the full last series (2.6.18-92* above) and the highest one > | from the series before (2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 and 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5). > > I would limit the kernels per distro: > ~ - The one(s) shipped on the media > ~ - The most recent kernel > ~ - The one before the most recent kernel Yepp, sounds sane. > BTW as far as I can tell there are no -92* kernel modules on ATrpms. IBTD :) nvidia-graphics173.14.09-kmdl-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5-173.14.09-99.el5.x86_64 Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080703/f7d59499/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Too many kernels?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list