[CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgTue Jul 15 10:58:56 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: > Johnny Hughes a écrit : <snip> >> My feeling is that we stick with the latest horde in the 3.1.x series >> in CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 (which is 3.1.8) and we wait until CentOS-6 >> where we will introduce the 3.2.x series (and all the associated apps). > > I you want to follow this way, provide Horde Webmail Groupware Edition > 1.1.1, which is one bundle of all associed apps, seems better for me. > Right, the latest groupware version in CentOS-6 is also an option ... although it is just all the components in one install. It still might be easier to have them broken out. But, the either way, the result is no upgrade that breaks horde now and an upgrade in CentOS-6. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080715/9943a190/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list