[CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
Niels de Vos
niels.devos at wincor-nixdorf.comWed Jul 16 10:00:47 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcus Moeller wrote: > Also RPM should be able to open a (gtk)dialog based script for > configuration. It might also be an option to provide useful upgrade > notices and a short link to them after package installation. This is totally against (probably any) RPM-packaging guidelines. I expect no CentOS developer would even consider this. For other distros the solution is fine, as long as they are not RPM-based :) Regards, Niels -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080716/f3ce0c52/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] New Horde version ... should we upgrade?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list