[CentOS-devel] Bad checksums in repodata
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgThu Jul 31 03:32:03 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Bad checksums in repodata
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Bad checksums in repodata
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > It seems like there are some bad checksums in the updates repodata for > the x86_64 5.2 tree (the onlyone I've checked). Trying to update a > freshly installed (and fairly minimal, so I don't know exactly how many > packages are affected) system I get: > > http://$myserver/yum/updates/centos-5/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: > [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download > http://$myserver/yum/updates/centos-5/x86_64/RPMS/yum-3.2.8-9.el5.centos.2.1.noarch.rpm: > [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download > http://$myserver/yum/updates/centos-5/x86_64/RPMS/selinux-policy-2.4.6-137.1.el5.noarch.rpm: > [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download > > And, indeed, checking the sha1sums of those packages against the values > in repodata/primary.xml.gz shows that they differ. I verified this > against multiple mirrors. Running 'createrepo' fixes the issue. > > It seems like there's already a hint of this as Issue 2997. > > Thanks. > This issue should have been cleared up long ago where are you syncing your info from -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080730/17a39c21/attachment-0002.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Bad checksums in repodata
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Bad checksums in repodata
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list