Manuel Wolfshant wrote: >>>> okay - it's fixed in 3.2.X in git - probably working in 3.2.16, too - >>>> but not in 3.2.8. >>>> >>> Could that be marked to become fixed as part of RHEL 5.3 ? >>> >> >> I think that's roughly in the plan but I'm not a rhel decider of any >> kind. >> > any chance of having this version of yum in centosplus ? > I have already been working on this, for completely different reasons... :D and James has offered to help out as well. Lookout for some news on this front in the next few days. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq