[CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
ivazqueznet at gmail.comThu Mar 27 11:27:30 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 11:21 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > So I'm not sure if that one can be used without problems. And it is not > > "Java compatible" yet (probably meaning that it hasn't been certified by > > Sun). > > Right, and I dont quite think its there yet IcedTea certainly seems closer to production than OpenJDK, which is ironic considering that IcedTea is the *next* version. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet at gmail.com> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080327/6959cb29/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list