[CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgFri Mar 28 12:36:33 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Re: rhwas 5 work?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Johnny Hughes wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > <snip> > > http://download.java.net/dlj/jdk6/README.html > > Doing more research, the license for distributing java FOR THE LATEST > SDK seems usable by CentOS. > > The new 1.1 version of the JDL is much better than the older license: > > http://download.java.net/dlj/jdk6/LICENSE > > Whether or not we can use this version of Java to work with the rhwas > remains to be seen, but if it will work, we may be in business :D Hmmm .. the indemnity clause is still there, though a bit lighter that the one I had major issues with. And openjdk is close ... I think we should wait since we will be supporting it for 5 more years, whatever we do. Open GPL'ed software is a much better approach I think. Sorry for getting everyone's hopes up for 30 minutes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20080328/b7f08b36/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] rhwas 5 work?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Re: rhwas 5 work?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list