Matt Rose wrote: >> I also have a wad of rubygems which are packaged and should be published >> somewhere (like a complete rails 2.1 environment, mod_passenger and other >> stuff). a Ruby SIG would be good to get going, we ( ralph and I ) spoke about this a while back. I have about 4 dozen rpms that could also go into this. > we could put them up on github or I could host a publically available > subver repo for ruby gem rpms, or something. It would be nice to have a > central repo for exactly this kind of stuff. I wonder how hard it > would be to do a gem2rpm script, like perl has with cpan2rpm. projects.centos.org solves this very problem :D But we would need a standard for the specs to get adopted, and working with atleast the Fedora standards would be a good place to start. So, is there interest in the ruby SIG ? and who wants to take ownership of spec sanity checking ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq